🔗 Share this article

I have some opinions about that remarks delivered by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's victory over the American player in the US Open quarter-finals. Look – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is American – and sports frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. A little bit of disappointment was appropriate. Instead, Fowler brought up the ongoing drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone love a storyline, me too. But come on. Even if Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, who Fritz has yet to beat in an official match. And had he someway survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven major titles (and the Spaniard proceeded to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press after the loss that he in fact liked his path, because it offered the opportunity to beat the top three players in the sport in succession. Fritz is more than within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match who else in their right mind had the drought of American champions in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is ranked fourth in the world starting the upcoming year-end championships and has won his last six matches over No 3 the German with increasing ease. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a chasm of ranking points away. His elite serve and concussive strength on each forehand and backhand are sufficiently enough to defeat most opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of generational talents, though, he is frequently helpless. The last several seasons has seen the interesting emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless move around with the surprising quickness and grace of much shorter men. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and playing a drop shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite harsh limitation on his upside.

The American has made a number of significant, unexpected advancements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months later, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded up to fourth place – and held the spot. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, Sinner, and even a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What could Fowler thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing slump of American men winning grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the respect for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in July.

Fritz’s play in that very last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian triumphed in four rounds, a win that only seemed tenuous for moments towards the very end, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with Fritz creating numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the point of agony. When Fritz eventually did claim a single of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly produced a terrible service game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and forced him to expend excessive effort to prevail. Down set points in the last game, his first serve floated to the sky. He extended the match twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a choke, in my opinion, just a result of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was quite ironclad evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of the Serbian, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and did not especially seem like he thought he could win. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The problem is those who were anticipating Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in press conferences, exceeding almost anyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, willing to not just say his emotions or the strategy he believed decided a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for the United States failing to produce a male major champion since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” Fritz told an interviewer in the summer of claiming a grand slam. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not fulfill that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is actually highly unlikely for all other players. {